After a decade of restructuring,
Siemens AG still works on a plan to promote growth and reduce costs by
implementing more efficient operation and manufacturing processes, eliminating
redundant functions and laggard units. In effort to cut cost, Siemens laid off a total number of 615 workers
in Iowa, Kansas, and Florida on September, 2012 because tax credit for wind
energy was not renewed by the Government. The Republican Party was fighting whether
or not to continue the tax credit program. During the recent five years period,
the wind energy industry is facing a substantial decrease in demand. As a
result, Siemens must find ways to adjust the manufacturing, planning project on
wind power to survive. Siemens will
cut about 8,000 positions at the end of 2012 globally. On the other hand, Peter Loescher, Chief
Executive Officer of Siemens AG, announced on September that he will
dispose the operation of solar thermal energy and photo-voltaic, just three
years after acquisitions.
According to him, there have been two distinct phases to push the
success of Siemens: the cost reduction phase from 2008 to 2011 which was view as
a big success. However, since 2011 a transition to a growth phase has faced
many difficulties. Nicholas Heymann, an analyst at William Blair in New York, said
that Siemens currently is under a critical transformation. Cost cutting and more
aggressive in selling peripheral businesses may not enough to be successful,
but doing fewer things on a truly global scale.
With the efficiency program, CEO Loescher hoped that Siemens AG
can reach the industrial earnings margin before interest at least 12%, compare
with 9.5% last year. However, some economics experts stated that this financial
target is far from ambitious because the market’s expectation on 2014 is 11.5%.
On November 8, 2012, Siemens AG made an announcement of a €6 billion savings
plan, which is significantly above market expectations, assets sales and a more
generous dividend policy. However, according to analyst Peter Reilly, restructuring
charges and weak prices will partially offset the gains.
To prepare for these outcomes, Siemens middle managers should do a
better job in managing human resources and manufacturing processes. It is
important to calm current employees down and to guarantee a stable future since
cutting labor has been the big threat for every employee. Besides, they need to
encourage and reward employees with creative and practical ideas of producing
effectively.
References
Pitt, David. (2012). Siemens
to lay off 615 in Iowa, Kansas, Florida. Businessweek. [Available at http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-09-18/siemens-to-lay-off-615-in-iowa-kansas-florida
]
Weiss, Richard.
(2012). Siemens Scaling Back Creates Chance to Reload Leadership. Bloomberg. [Available
at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-07/siemens-scaling-back-gives-loescher-chance-to-reload-leadership.html
]
Geiger,
Friedrich. (2012). Siemens’ Cost Cutting Plan Impresses, But There’s More to Do.
The Wall street journal. [Available at http://blogs.wsj.com/source/2012/11/08/siemens-cost-cutting-plan-impresses-but-theres-more-to-do/?KEYWORDS=siemens]
I agree that Siemens should make an effort to calm employees. I also think that if Siemens is considering selling asset units, it should make that clear to employees involved in those units. That is the tricky part, though. How can the firm expect employees to maintain a high level of productivity and dedication to the unit if they know they are on the bubble of extinction?
ReplyDeleteIt seems difficult for Siemens's managers in order to calm down their employees in such situation when the threat of lay off is everywhere. Who can guarantee that employees still work efficiently?! A completely plan, hence, on what will change? Who will leave? Who will stay? How to keep the best employee? How and who will do each step of changing plan? etc is very necessary.
ReplyDelete